Supporters believe that privacy should be protected in all cases, while those who are against it believe that this is not the case when public health is threatened. I understand how some people can be careless by disregarding protection guidance and deliberately mixing with others. As I said before, I will never get tired of saying that it is our behavior that will keep us corona-free, and if we behave as we are supposed to, coronavirus will not find a home to survive, and that home is a cell in the human lungs. Most of us today have one or more accounts in these electronic programs, for which you must include data about yourself when registering such as name, nationality, country and age. Keep wearing your masks when in closed quarters, try your best to keep your distance from your brothers and sisters, and once you finish a job, wash your hands or keep a sanitizer handy. I think this issue is more complicated and overlapping, and the topic of health privacy today is not spying on the personal info of individuals without their knowledge. ” He continued, “regardless of how much you love your family and children, you will always need friends. I think this issue will always be debatable for various reasons, mostly political, but with the advent of COVID-19, it has become more intense and the argument has become more complicated and confusing. Amnesty International has warned that applications to track coronavirus patients may collect in-depth personal information, claiming that the privacy and security of thousands of people is at risk by the new platforms. Personally, I am a supporter of privacy of individuals and protecting them from harm, especially with regards to their personal life and security, but are we tackling this issue from a political and human perspective or health-wise or both? Is age and gender confidential information nowadays? I am not a proponent of violating privacy, and I respect this vehemently, but I wonder which data that can pose a danger when exposed publicly.
